RISES -AM-

Responses to coastal climate change: Innovative Strategies for high End Scenarios -Adaptation and Mitigation-

 

Objective:

RISES -AM- assessed the impacts of future sea-level rise and the effectiveness of a wide range of adaptation options and strategies. RISES -AM- also considered the barriers to implementing adaptation at local, regional and global scales, across a range of representative concentration pathways (RCPs) and shared socio-economic pathways (SSPs), including exploring high-end scenarios not included in IPCC reports.
High-end scenarios may refer to climate change drivers of coastal impacts (such as e.g. sea level rise) or to socio-economic drivers affecting exposure and vulnerabilities (e.g. assets or population affected). RISES -AM- has considered such high-end scenarios from short (months) to long (decades) time scales. The analysis includes a new high-end sea-level rise scenario developed within RISES -AM-. High-end scenarios are particularly important for the management of situations of high exposure and risk aversion, which is generally the case for many densely populated coastal zones.
RISES -AM- assessed impacts both under present adaptation practice (business as usual) as well as under “additional” adaptation that will be required due to the expected acceleration of climate change during this century. For the latter the possible adaptation interventions have been sequentially structured into adaptation pathways that prevent decisions conflicting with longer term limits or requirements. The emphasis has been on vulnerable coastal systems such as deltas or low-lying coastal areas with large population.

 

Funded by:

The project RISES -AM- is funded by the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (2007 – 2013), under the grant agreement number 603396.

 

Findings:

RISES -AM- analysed technological, economic, financial and social conflicts and barriers to coastal adaptation under high-end sea-level rise in a range of case studies at different scales. Across all cases, adaptation was found to be technologically possible. Generally, in the cases considered adaptation is costly but pays off in pure monetary terms for densely populated urban regions. We found very high benefit-cost ratios for protecting cities as well as for nourishing beaches used for tourism, which suggests that these two measures will be wide-spread in the future. In rural and poorer areas, however, protection measures generally have benefit-cost ratios smaller than one, which suggests that it will be difficult to mobilise the required resources for protection if those regions don't receive money from elsewhere.

 

Case study

Adaptation goal

Options considered

Technological limits

Profitability barriers

Financing barriers

Social conflicts

Liverpool/Mersey

Reduce flood risk in situ

Tidal barrage, tidal lagoons

no

yes

no

yes

Danube delta

Maintain wetlands

Planting reeds, artificial reefs

no

some

yes

yes

Catalan coast

Maintain beaches and tourism

Beach nourishment

no

no

no

no

Reduce erosion damage to land

Beach nourishment, artificial dunes, protection structures, managed retreat

no

yes

yes

yes

Reduce sea-level rise damage to ports

Break waters, covered with vegetation

no

no

yes

yes

Ebro delta

Maintain rice production

Dikes, land raising, segmentation of drainage and irrigation networks

no

yes

yes

some

Hamburg

Reduce flood risk in situ

Dikes, sea-walls, retention areas

no

n/a

no

yes

Hulhumalé (Maldives)

Reduce flood risk in situ

Flood warning system, beach nourishment, sea-walls, pumps & drainage, land raising

no

no

no

yes

Ho Chi Min City

Reduce flood risk in situ

Dike rings, land raising and flood-proofing buildings

no

no

yes

yes

Croatia

Reduce flood risk

Dikes, set-back zones

no

some

yes

yes

Aveiro coast (Portugal)

Maintain land threatened by erosion

Nourishment

no

no

yes

no

Holland coast (The Netherlands)

Maintain land threatened by erosion

Nourishment

no

no

no

no

Global flood risk

Reduce flood risk

Dikes, managed retreat

no

no

some

yes

Mediterranean

Reduce flood risk

Dikes, set-back zones, flood-proofing buildings

no

no

some

yes

European Union flood risk

Reduce flood risk

Dikes

no

no

some

yes


But even when coastal protection is attractive in monetary terms, mobilising financial resources may be difficult due to high up-front investments paired with long-term stochastic returns on investment. Irrespective of the technological, economic and financing situation, it was also found that most coastal adaptation options involve significant social conflicts due to diverse coastal stakeholders, interests, activities and policy goals (e.g., flood security, tourism, nature protection, shipping and ports). We conclude that integrating financial, equity and social conflict issues will be a key for advancing coastal adaptation.

The main findings of RISES -AM- are summarised in a global policy brief.

 

Contact:

Jochen Hinkel

Daniel Lincke

News

25.04.16

GREEN-WIN Project Website Launched

The GREEN-WIN project has launched a new website to support knowledge transfer and sharing of...


05.04.16

Adaptation requires overcoming social conflicts

A Perspective article, published by the Global Climate Forum in the journal Nature Climate Change,...


go to Archive ->
Please register here to follow the GCF newsletter.
Register
 

Contact

Global Climate Forum e.V.
Neue Promenade 6
10178 Berlin
Germany

info(at)globalclimateforum.org
Phone: +49 (0)30 2060 738 0